I’d have to buy a copy made to work with the CanoScan 9000F Mark II. Unfortunately, my copy of SilverFast works only for Epson V300 scanners. The scans still aren’t fully lab quality but they’re close enough. I already own SilverFast for the Epson V300 and know it to be cumbersome and frustrating but effective. If I keep experimenting, I might get better scans. It cleaned up the marks, but added unsatisfying mottling on the shadowy parts of the image. So I turned on ScanGear’s dust and scratch removal. This negative was loaded with dust, or maybe scratches as no amount of cleaning ever cleared it up. The Fulltone scan is obviously sharper, even at blog resolution. This photo of a green house shows it best. I couldn’t resolve considerable softness in many of the images. But even the base scans offered dramatically better sharpness, color, and tonality than the CanoScan. I Photoshopped those scans to my satisfaction, too. Yashica Lynx 14e on Fujifilm Superia X-tra 400.įulltone Photo of La Grange, Kentucky, processed the film and scanned the negatives on their big Noritsu scanner. But here goes: my first CanoScan/ScanGear image. I’m still building my scanning skills and knowledge, so this comparison is bound to be flawed.
SILVERFAST CANON 9000F SOFTWARE
The Epson software couldn’t do that and it was a pain to sample and correct for the mask. I was thrilled that ScanGear automatically removed the color negative’s orange mask. I then edited the scans in Photoshop until I was reasonably satisfied. So the other night, too tired to sleep, I got out some recent color negatives and scanned them with the CanoScan and ScanGear. The software Epson bundled with my V300 was terrible, and I expected Canon’s bundled software to be, too. They turned out well enough using the bundled ScanGear software. Life’s been stupid crazy since then and I haven’t made time to play with the CanoScan, except for the quick scans I made of my mother-in-law’s 1940s-50s Kodachromes (see some here, here, and here).
SILVERFAST CANON 9000F UPGRADE
It’s an upgrade over my previous scanner, an Epson V300, which handles only 35mm. It scans both 35mm and medium-format negatives. I need to know very soon as I still have some days left to return the scanner I might have bought without actually needing a new scanner as the problem was not the scanner but the software.My wife bought us a Canon CanoScan 9000F Mark II scanner a couple years ago. I then tried to scan photoes and found out that the output was OK with both scanners. I then the used the software that came with the Canoscan 9000F Mark II and had no problem with the output.
SILVERFAST CANON 9000F 64 BIT
I tried both the old and the new scanner on 32 bit Windows 7, 64 bit Windows 7, 64 bit virtual Windows 7, 64 bit Windows 8,1. I thought the scanner was broken and bought a new scanner Canoscan 9000F Mark II. The preview picture was OK, but the scanned final output was very distorted. Then about a month ago I wanted to use the Canoscan 9000F again. I also have a Plustek Optekfilm 8200i using Silverfast 8 SE Plus.
I have never had any problem, I was actually very impressed with the software (Silverfast SE 8.2). I had worked with Canoscan 9000F on both my 32 bit and 64 bit Windows 7 computers. I have earlier written concerning a problem I have with Canoscan 9000F and Canoscan 9000F Mark II.
0 kommentar(er)
